anonymous

GUIA DEL ESTUDIANTE
EU CETT-UB

Assessment

The EUHT CETT-UB Master's Committee is responsible for assigning reviewers regarding the topic and the type of MCP. It is constituted by: 

  • Director of the EUHT CETT – UB.
  • EUHT CETT – UB Master Coordination
  • Director of the Master
  • Coordinator of the specialization related to the MCP. 
  • Director of the E3 (MCP).
The examining board assigned for each MCP will assess all the submitted materials (project's full report and paper) and the defense. MCP Coordination is responsible for submitting the grades to the Registrar's Office.
 
a. Evaluation Criteria 

The evaluation criteria applies to all projects (research and professional). The same criteria is applied for single and for group projects: 

ITEMS

(%)

CRITERIA

MEMORIA

55

 

Structure and formal aspects 

5

Following the required structure/ sections, following the style manual (citation, graphics, tables …) and using correct syntax and spelling

Objectives and hypothesis



10
Development and achievement of the objectives (and the formulation of the hypothesis)
Literature Review & State of the art

10

Key concepts, authors and main theories and the current situation

Methodology of the research

10

Required methodology aspects: 

- Type of research (descriptive, comparative, analytic, ...) 

- Type of methodology (quantitative, qualitative o mixed) 

- Technics and instruments for information gathering (interview, survey, observation, gathering of data…)

Quality of the results

20

Adaptation of the results and conclusions to the objectives

PAPER

20

 

Structure & Formal Aspect

5

Following the required structure/ sections, following the style manual (citation, graphics, tables …) and using correct syntax and spelling

Information Collection

10

Including all the relevant information

Adaptation to publishing criteria

5

Possibility to be published

DEFENSE

15

 

Clarity & Synthesis of the oral presentation

6

Clarity, organization y synthesis of the speech in the designated time.

Quality of the support media

3

Quality and use of the PowerPoint presentation

Adequacy of the answers to the Board’s questions

6

Accuracy in the identification of the questions and precision of the answers

EVALUATION OF THE PROCESS (only advisors) 

10

 

Aplicabilidad del proyecto

2

Grado de aplicación del proyecto y contribución a la mejora

Attendance to tutorial classes & Adjustment to the schedule

2

Attendance

Following and fulfilling the scheduled tasks

Proactive attitude

6

Initiative and autonomy levels



IMPORTANT: The MCP Advisor has the authority to exclude and students from the evaluation process of the subject. This exclusion implies failing the subject with no option to re-evaluate. 

Check Evaluation Template

c. Re-assessment 

Re-assessment is available for those students who have failed the MCP. Only students who have FAILED the project are elegible for re-assessment. Students who haven't submitted the project or who have passed the subject may not be suitable for re-assessment.
Group projects with a passing grade will not be re-evaluated, even if one or more students from the group have failed.
Re-evaluated projects may not get a grade higher than 5.